In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 19:00:30 -0400: Hi, [snip] I don't necessarily believe it either. I just thought it was interesting to point out what is really at stake here, if it should turn out to be true.
>I dont believe Rossi when he says that Ni is being consumed in the Rossi >reactor, because he cannot accurately measure how much nickel is present in >the ash. > > >On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 12 May 2011 >> 09:04:28 -0500: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >Such apparent ignorance seems to suggest, at least to me, that >> >something else is responsible for generating all the mysterious >> >exothermic heat. That certainly is the 64 trillion dollar question. >> >> Based on world reserves of 2.2E8 tons of Ni and 5% of this useable at 30% >> conversion efficiency, 5 MeV / reaction, and electricity at 10 cents/kWh, >> it's >> actually nearer to 680 trillion dollars. ;) >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
