OK, Everyone appears to be angry at Krivit but to be fair to the guy his line of questioning did seem to get back directly to the point where we left it on Vortex - My recollection was that we decided the steam measurement was an unreliable calculation but that the experiment with only a 5 degree increase in water temperature proved there was real thermal gain. Was this difference between mass and volumetric methods of measuring steam energy already resolved? Levi and Rossi are reacting like this was already abundantly clear but I really don't recall this issue as ever have been put to bed. Did I miss something?
Fran -----Original Message----- From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Steve Krivit's initiative On 2011-06-17 16:22, Mark Iverson wrote: > That's ridiculous... I highly doubt that Krivit did anything like that... > What is more likely is > that Levi misunderstood something that Krivit said due to the language > barrier. Steve mentioned in > his report that he felt Levi had trouble understanding some elements of what > he was saying. > Interesting... Regarding that, this an "open letter" (in English) from Giuseppe Levi to Steven Krivit that just got posted on 22passi (I feel it might be subject to slight grammer/wording changes, so I'm not copy/pasting it here). It appears that he is not pleased of Krivit's preliminary travel report too: Short URL: http://goo.gl/2vr0M http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/quattro-gatti-e-sette-persone-3.html Cheers, S.A.
