> 1) Does Levi, et.al., understand the importance of the dry steam issue?
They may be afraid to think about this show-stopping issue. > 2) If the answer to #1 is YES, then do you feel that adequate care was taken > in the tests we've seen > to establish that the steam was truly dry? Maybe they're in denial and so have not taken adequate care. > 3) Has this recent exchange caused by Krivit's visit changed your opinion at > all? Good or bad... It's made me more sure that there is no excess heat. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > Fran, > You summed it up quite well... > > I think the overall concensus of those vorts who have discussed the e-Cat > tests agree that the > dryness of the steam is a MAJOR source of concern and there are INADEQUATE > explanations from the > Rossi camp as to that issue. Steve was pushing hard to make sure that that > issue was understood by > Levi/Rossi and an adequate explanation was returned. I don't think he got > what he, and most of us, > wanted... > > However, what I'd like to see now is some discussion from the collective > about Levi's written > response, aside from its contentious nature, and to have fellow vorts answer > these questions: > > 1) Does Levi, et.al., understand the importance of the dry steam issue? > 2) If the answer to #1 is YES, then do you feel that adequate care was taken > in the tests we've seen > to establish that the steam was truly dry? > 3) Has this recent exchange caused by Krivit's visit changed your opinion at > all? Good or bad... > > -Mark
