Todd,
Did you see Robert Leguillon’s response to your comparison?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg48252.html
He makes a good point about the energy required to heat a fixed quantity of
water in a kettle as opposed to a constant “stream” of cold water from a
reservoir. Did your kettle contain the same volume of water for a given time
period and heat it into steam as quickly? The point he mentioned about the
steam affluence being proportional to flow rates extends all the way down to
the 5 degree rise in water temp highlighted in the Feb test where there was no
change of state. I wouldn’t pitch this system to anyone yet either but I think
you will see an increasing number of lesser replications and an avalanche of
emerging information from several key players in addition to Rossi. Brian
Ahern’s recent replication based on Arrata method is just the tip of the
iceberg.
regards
Fran
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:E-Cat vs. Water Heater for coffee/tea...
Yes, that's why I said 'supposed to be', which implied I didn't know whether it
was one 2.5 kW unit, or all four running for a total of 10 kW. In either case,
we're still short steam...that's the point. And the quality of the steam
should be clear based on how it is exiting the hose - it's wet steam unless
he's somehow filtering the steam. Regardless, it's the steam, not the water,
that does useful work, and there isn't much steam coming out of the hose.
Since it's not my technology, and I don't review advanced energy technologies
for a living, it's not my concern beyond showing that what has been presented
to date is inconclusive at best.
What I WON'T do is pitch this as a valid technology to outside parties, and I
have also alerted those who may be directly impacted by this technology to take
a MUCH closer look, which at the moment Rossi will not allow. So with that
said, I have no further comment on this technology due to a lack of information
beyond what has been presented to date, which again, remains inconclusive at
best. I'll check back in six months to see if anything has changed...fighting
over which words are used in a forum post is a waste of time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Vo]:E-Cat vs. Water Heater for coffee/tea...
From: "Mark Iverson" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 12:09 pm
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Todd:
You really shold take some time and fully verify your facts before accusing
someone of fraud...
I believe that the e-Cat Krivit saw was only 2.5kW, not 10.
-Mark
