Didn't you know this contradicts Sven Kullander's statement that the post reaction sample ratio Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 2.24? When asked about this in his blog several weeks ago, Rossi said Kullander is right. So Rossi continues to supply the media with conflicting information. Harry
From: Mark Iverson <zeropo...@charter.net> >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:24:19 AM >Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ecatreport part 2 > > > >Another tidbit, but from part 1 of 2... > >"The post-reaction analysis shows a copper isotope ratio of Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 1.6, while the natural occurrence show a ratio of Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 2.24 which is a statistically significant difference. That, of course, excludes contamination as an explanation of Copper content in the post reaction samples." > >-Mark > From: Alan J Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 5:31 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: [Vo]:Ecatreport part 2 > > http://ecatreport.com/e-cat/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-22 > >Defkalion GT has hired a separate team of people in order to get this in place because of the complexity of the issue. The biggest problem has been to find an auto-destruct mechanism that is not harmful while still fulfilling its purpose. I am still not sure if the mechanism is fully developed as of yet, but Defkalion GT who is responsible for its development has told me that all details have been solved and that the E-Cat now has 12 levels of security. > > >The management team of both Defkalion and AmpEnergo will meet on the 14th July (2011) together with NASA for an important discussion regarding the research and business development around the E-Cat. After the initial meeting with NASA, Defkalion GT and Ampenergo will sit down and develop a joint program for the introduction of the E-Cat as a main energy source to the world. > >[ and they DID ask the "steam" question. ] > >
