In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:02:26 -0700: Hi, [snip] >But Robin, how about the 2nd half of that excerpt, where the optimal >grain-size is more than a >micrometer, not nanometers... I would think that a 'tubercle', which is likely >composed of numerous >'grains', would be larger than its constituent parts (i.e. a grain)! > >"Rossi tells that he worked every waking hour for six months straight, trying >dozens of combinations >to find the optimal powder size for the Energy Catalyzer, or E-Cat. He further >stresses that >specific data about the final optimal grain size cannot be revealed, but can >tell us that the most >efficient grain size is more in the micrometer range rather than the nanometer >range." > >-Mark
Misunderstanding on my part, however I would have expected the tubules to be on the grains, not composed of grains, so a micron size would have provided lots of room for tubules. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
