Harry Veeder wrote:
To be fair, in this report http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf Rossi and Focardi describe some other water flow tests on page 3.
The text is confusing. The liquid flowing water tests are listed in Table 1, p. 4. Flowing water is method B, in the tests conducted in 2009. There are two tests:
Feb. 17 to March 3 (15 days), input was 5.1 kWh, output was 1006.5 kWh. That's 375 hours, so input is 14 W and output is 2,684 W. Right?
March 5 to April 26 (22 days), input was 18.45 kWh and output was 3768 kWh. 527 hours. Input 35 W, output 7,150 W.
The heading for Table 1 is below the table. This is a confusing document. - Jed
