On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hello group, > Andrea Rossi > >> July 17th, 2011 at 1:54 PM >> >> Dear Paul Story: >> Very funny: this clown, named Julian Brown, wrote me saying he was an >> officer of the Patent Office and that he wanted give me suggestions. >> I received him to get those suggestions, curious to know about what he had >> to suggest. I was working in my Bologna lab when I received him ahd he saw >> one E-Cat under test for no more that 30 seconds, after which I invired hin >> to exit. He made no tests, he saw nothing, he just has taken a 30 seconds >> glance at a totally closed box. He saw nothing, I said nothing. >> We agreed, after a short meeting, that he would have mailed to me a text >> of a patent that he thought would have many probabilities to be accepted. >> After some day I received from this clown some text simply ridiculous, and >> in these text there was written that my patent was based on patents made >> from my competitors. I made a research and discovered that the patents of my >> competitors he referred to had not been granted, but had been refused. Of >> course he has been sent from such competitors to spy and to try to mess up >> with patents. >> Conclusion: he lies when he says he made a test, he lies when he says he >> has seen an E-Cat enough to say anything about it (just has taken a 30 >> seconds look), he lies if he says he has seen the steam, he saw nothing >> because the circuit was ermetically closed, he lies when he says that he is >> or has been an officer of the Patent Office, he lies when he says he is an >> expert of patents, he lies when he says that my Competitor he works with has >> a patent on this matter granted in 1995. >> It is clear that somebody, desperate of the fact that a 1 MW plant is >> close to be started up, is trying to use all the method of a snake to try to >> put clubs in the wheels. But all this is just clownery: my plants will give >> evidence in the real marlet of the validity of my effect. >> It is also clear that at this point I cannot give any more info or >> courtesy visit before the start up of my 1 MW plant. >> > > Someone is lying, but I'm not convinced it's Brown. At least, except for the exact timing, Rossi does not really contradict Brown's list of reasons re-presented here: "Imagine my astonishment and disappointment on finding that Rossi makes no attempt to monitor the dryness of the output and there was no appropiate equipment visible on the premises." It should not take very long to determine that Rossi does not monitor dryness. We all knew that in advance anyway, because Rossi doesn't even claim to use equipment capable of monitoring steam dryness. "It follows that Rossi can not possibly know whether he has 1,2 5 or even 10 percent unvaporized phase by weight. Passive observers like myself, Krivit, Essen & Kullander have even less chance of determining this crucial parameter." I would say, we can't know that it isn't >90% liquid by weight, which is almost certainly the case. "Even worse, since the output tube went straight through a hole in the wall to be vented/flushed outside, it could have been pure hot water and nobody, least of all Rossi, could possibly know." Ah yes, or 100% liquid for that matter. Although the stable temperature suggests the presence of at least some steam. And some of the demo videos also show small puffs of steam consistent with a few hundred watts of power or so. "Basically, the whole set up defies even approximate quantitative calorimetric analysis." That can be seen from the videos; a 30 s glance is not required. "Another odd thing was that Rossi pumped up the electrical power for a minute or two shortly before turning it off and allowing me to see that the water kept an output temperature of 100.5 for a couple of minutes." That contradicts Rossi's claim of a 30 second glance. If true though, it is an odd thing for Rossi to do, because if the steam was dry, pumping up the electrical power would increase the temperature well above boiling; it would not "keep to 100.5 for a couple of minutes". "The final clincher for me is that Rossi made a point of telling me that he was currently vaporizing 15 litres / hour. BUT, the peristaltic pump was exactly the same one he uses in all demonstrations and it was pulsing about once every 2.5 seconds. I make that 3 litres / hour, only 20 percent of what Rossi told me verbally." Once again, Rossi is caught in a flow rate exaggeration. And this observation would not take more than 30 s, so it doesn't contradict Rossi. I can hardly wait to hear Rossi's first excuse for the delay of the MW plant, or for the claim that some sort of shower of hot water consistent with the input electrical power represents a MW of dry steam; a bogus 10 kW ecat writ large.
