Julian Brown wrote: > Basically, the whole set up defies even approximate quantitative > calorimetric analysis. > This is nonsensical speculation. E-Cat is designed to be a standard boiling water reactor and boiling water reactor is exactly similar setup than a kettle. And we know that tea pots do not produce wet steam. It is very safe conclusion to make that E-Cat produces 95-99% dry steam. That means that energy calculations are accurate up to 95%. This is very simple and very basic physics.
Also we can calculate the internal pressure, because we know that the opening for the hose is 10-25 mm wide. This is very simple mathematics. For the measurements itself even thermometer is irrelevant, because you can inspect visually the dryness of the steam. At least I can measure when I am cooking pasta, and I am performing empirical analysis when the water has reached approximately 100°C temperature. Unlike Julian suggest, I certainly do not need a caloric meter for cooking pasta! It is just, that this whole speculation has been gone far too complex, because certain two dimensional "scientists" lacks common sense, so that they fail even rudimentary skills, like they are unable to cook pasta without proper calorimetric analysis. This is just silly. > The small chimney will result in a small overpressure and a boiling > temperature > 100 Celsius, so I am not impressed by 100.5 Celsius > Chimney is the widest part of the E-Cat. However the opening for the hose is small, perhaps 15-25 mm and it may rise the boiling point to 99.9-100.2 °C. > He certainly has a charming manner; I liked him and would never suggest he > has criminal intent. In the USA, maximum sentence from fraud is 150 years in prison. I am sure that sig. Rossi has prepared himself for a fraud. In other words, these are extremely serious and insulting accusations. –Jouni
