At 04:30 PM 7/17/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-07-17 22:16, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I did not find any name Julian Brown related to EPO, except for an
inventor with this name:
Then it's possible that it isn't his real name or that he isn't
related with EPO or other patent offices. If the latter is the case,
then I guess Rossi might be right when he says that there people
trying to actively discredit him or steal some of his trade secrets.
That's quite a conclusion to jump to. Julian Brown claimed to be
employed by the EPO, but made no claim to be representing them. He's
also asked that his blog post be taken down:
Can i ask you, for the sake of my family, to remove my submission to
your blog.
It was sent in good faith, because I really care about the LENR
field and don't want it to suffer yet another set back, but I see I
may have stirred up a hornet's nest.
Julian Brown
It's too late, Julian, the 'cat's out of the bag. Good luck. I tend
to believe you, your story is credible, and Rossi's response is
atrociously obnoxious, worse than his paranoid response to Krivit.
Rossi, roughly, confirmed your story.
It doesn't make sense, if you were employed by a competitor to
"steal" his secret, that you would "expose" him like this. Your
comments are not outside what has already been noted by many, though
you added some personal details that amount to little more than Rossi
not being careful what he says to you.
Your theory in your blog post was this:
My hunch is that he did make a discovery that goes beyond the level
acheived by Piantelli and Focardi, but that he got too enthusiastic
too soon, before he had really done due diligence. He is now trapped
in the web of commitments and claims he has made. A tragic figure really.
I've stated that as a possibility, because this has happened to
inventors before, who are tempted to "amplify" test results because
they've become trapped in overenthusiastic claims. I've suggested the
possibility -- that is all that it is, this isn't an accusation -- in
response to those who express disbelief that an inventor would set
himself up for humiliation when the fraud is exposed.
In this scenario, Rossi believes that he found something, but, hey,
there are some kinks to be worked out.... and people are clamoring
for a demo, Focardi wants a demo, so ... here's a demo. And when it's
pointed out how shallow that demo is, here is another, and another.
Each one mysteriously defective in what is demonstrated. What that
means is far from clear. But "fraud" isn't as impossible as some claim.
Now he's got a perfect excuse to avoid any more demos, the "snakes"
Krivit and Brown. It is tragic, actually, if he believes it, and
tragic in a different way if he's lying. Krivit wasn't working for a
competitor of Rossi, and I quite doubt that Brown was, either.
Brown's story is quite believable.
At some point Kullander and Essen will wake up and see how their
names are being used to validate Rossi. Unless they have seen more
than they are letting on. I want to point out that Rossi = paranoid
and suspicious, shady and evasive, does not prove that Rossi is
wrong. Maybe Kullander and Essen know something we don't!
Is Krivit asking them? Someone should be! Where is Lewan, lately?
