Angela Kemmler <[email protected]> wrote:
> A source close to the test gave Jed Rothwell the following figures. > > How would you call that? Don’t be upset, but I would call that: „an > unpublished report of data of an anonymous source on a private webpage“. > Don’t you agree? Call it anything you like. The data was reviewed by Rossi on his webpage and it was also published in NyTeknik. It is obvious that Rossi, Levi and the others have seen the NyTeknik article and also LENR-CANR.org. They would have told Lewan and I if our accounts were incorrect. They may be lying, but there is no chance that my numbers are not what they reported. > Why is it possible, that the (IMHO) most interesting test of the wondrous > device remains undocumented? Why are Rossi and Levi hiding the > notebook-files? The make and model of the flowmeter. I asked them several times and they ignored me. There is probably other germane information in their notebooks. They are not hiding it exactly; they are simply ignoring requests for information. Many professors do that. Generally speaking, getting information out of academic researchers is like pulling teeth. - Jed
