I wrote:
> Oh please. Levi's by-line is in the NyTekNik article. Take it or leave it. > Cut the legalese. > I mean to say it is not his by-line; it is by Lewan, but it is ridiculous to doubt it. Levi would have objected if he had been misquoted. This legalistic speculation that the data in NyTekNik or LENR-CANR.org is not what was reported by Levi et al. to us is outrageous. Of course it is what they reported! Make of these results what you will. Go ahead and invent absurd fairy tales about how there might be 1000 times less heat than the laws of nature prove it is. But please stop the nonsensical assertions that Lewan and I are incapable of writing down numbers that people tell us! This is a science forum, not a courtroom. Frankly, it is damned insulting to suggest that I would lie about these numbers, or that Lewan and are incapable of transcribing tape recorded conversations (what he did), copying numbers out of e-mail, or double-checking figures. If you don't want to believe Levi that's fine but don't blame us for reporting what he and the other said. - Jed
