Am 09.09.2011 20:24, schrieb Peter Gluck:
How could they know that it was air in the reactor? I
Dont know. You must ask them. Maybe it was open and exposed to air long
before, or they asked Rossi.
If it was how can 50 cc air be transforrned in a small
impurity?
At 20 bar pressure 50 cc compresses to 2.5 cc.
Why does noiw Rossi say he is flushing too?
We dont know. It makes sense to do that, even if not necessary, because
eliminating unknown and unneeded factors is always good.
Maybe he got the idea just now, from the question ;-)
Ask Rossi. He will say: Cannot give information about the the reactor ;-)
Lack of reliable, serious data. Or the additive (not catalyst)
can be molecular sieves?
There is not much information in Rossis Forum. Rossi repeats his mantra
over and over in the forum and shows that he is still alive.
NASA and Bushnell should know more. They had already tested the
Piantelli experiments, and if they are still working with Rossi, there
must be something behind, but they dont want to tell us now -obviously.
Maybe they obfuscate it by purpose.
Kullander and Essen could know, in case they have received a real cell
with the original core material for
analysis- but I doubt, how could they find natural isotopic
distribution of Ni and Cu?
Dont know. Dont know if they found something else. If yes, then they
might not want to make it public now in the media and must investigate
this scientifically. Maybe they all smoke something ;-)
Peter
Peter
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Kullander and Essen reported, that the reactor was not flushed.
<http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.>
Page 2 , "Startup":
"The air of atmospheric pressure was remaining in the container as
a small impurity."
Am 09.09.2011 06:18, schrieb Peter Gluck:
I have found this as interesting too, because Rossi has
repeatedly suggested that his system can tolerate air in contact
with the core material:
*
Andrea Rossi
September 4th, 2011 at 3:17 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=6#comment-68499>
Dear Alan De Angelis:
We have to purge also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
*
Alan DeAngelis
September 4th, 2011 at 1:33 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=6#comment-68481>
Dear Ing. Rossi:
I’m just curious. When organic chemists do catalytic
hydrogenations (with palladium, nickel, et cetera) in a
pressurized
shakerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenation they first
purge air out of the system by cycling back and forth between
vacuum (with a vacuum pump) and hydrogen several times before
they finally pressurize with hydrogen. Do you do this with
the E-Cat or do you just blow the air out with some hydrogen
and go straight to the pressurization? (Don’t feel obliged to
answer this if it would reveal too much about the process.)
All the best,
Alan DeAngelis
According to Piantelli (see WO 2010/058288 for example) deep
degassing is a sine qua non condition of
success/reproducibility because gas molecules adsorbed on
the active clusters compete with hydrogen.
Peter
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:44 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent
Johnson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Jed sez:
> Alan: Thanks again for monitoring Rossi's blog.
It's a dirty job and Alan is the right man to do it.
I ditto Jed's sentiments.
Thanks, Alan.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com <http://www.OrionWorks.com>
www.zazzle.com/orionworks <http://www.zazzle.com/orionworks>
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
