Thanks for the answers. We have to use statistics to draw false conclusions from true/real data but nothing can help in order to draw good conclusions from false or imaginary data. If they are contradictory even worse.
NASA and Bushnell have not tested Piantelli's method, they have never written to him and it is also not sure that NASA is Rossi's Great American Partner. Rossi is the most unpredictable individual I ever met on the Web. You can see at my blog that I am fond of interestingness but NOT this kind of interestingness. Peter On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 09.09.2011 20:24, schrieb Peter Gluck: > > How could they know that it was air in the reactor? I > > Dont know. You must ask them. Maybe it was open and exposed to air long > before, or they asked Rossi. > > If it was how can 50 cc air be transforrned in a small > impurity? > > At 20 bar pressure 50 cc compresses to 2.5 cc. > > Why does noiw Rossi say he is flushing too? > > We dont know. It makes sense to do that, even if not necessary, because > eliminating unknown and unneeded factors is always good. > Maybe he got the idea just now, from the question ;-) > Ask Rossi. He will say: Cannot give information about the the reactor ;-) > > Lack of reliable, serious data. Or the additive (not catalyst) > can be molecular sieves? > > There is not much information in Rossis Forum. Rossi repeats his mantra > over and over in the forum and shows that he is still alive. > NASA and Bushnell should know more. They had already tested the Piantelli > experiments, and if they are still working with Rossi, there must be > something behind, but they dont want to tell us now -obviously. > Maybe they obfuscate it by purpose. > > Kullander and Essen could know, in case they have received a real cell > with the original core material for > analysis- but I doubt, how could they find natural isotopic distribution of > Ni and Cu? > > Dont know. Dont know if they found something else. If yes, then they might > not want to make it public now in the media and must investigate this > scientifically. Maybe they all smoke something ;-) > > Peter > > > Peter > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Kullander and Essen reported, that the reactor was not flushed. >> >> <http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.><http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.> >> Page 2 , "Startup": >> "The air of atmospheric pressure was remaining in the container as a small >> impurity." >> >> Am 09.09.2011 06:18, schrieb Peter Gluck: >> >> I have found this as interesting too, because Rossi has >> repeatedly suggested that his system can tolerate air in contact with the >> core material: >> >> >> >> - Andrea Rossi >> September 4th, 2011 at 3:17 >> PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=6#comment-68499> >> >> Dear Alan De Angelis: >> We have to purge also. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> - Alan DeAngelis >> September 4th, 2011 at 1:33 >> PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=6#comment-68481> >> >> Dear Ing. Rossi: >> I’m just curious. When organic chemists do catalytic hydrogenations >> (with palladium, nickel, et cetera) in a pressurized shaker >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenation they first purge air out of >> the system by cycling back and forth between vacuum (with a vacuum pump) >> and >> hydrogen several times before they finally pressurize with hydrogen. Do >> you >> do this with the E-Cat or do you just blow the air out with some hydrogen >> and go straight to the pressurization? (Don’t feel obliged to answer this >> if >> it would reveal too much about the process.) >> >> All the best, >> Alan DeAngelis >> >> >> According to Piantelli (see WO 2010/058288 for example) deep >> degassing is a sine qua non condition of success/reproducibility because >> gas molecules adsorbed on the active clusters compete with hydrogen. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Peter >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:44 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Jed sez: >>> >>> > Alan: Thanks again for monitoring Rossi's blog. >>> >>> It's a dirty job and Alan is the right man to do it. >>> >>> I ditto Jed's sentiments. >>> >>> Thanks, Alan. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Steven Vincent Johnson >>> www.OrionWorks.com >>> www.zazzle.com/orionworks >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
