I agree that we can view virtual photons as expanding through our lower
dimensional 3-di "Plane" I think of this expansion in terms of a photon
"traveling" half a wavelength then disappearing. From any standpoint the
Quantum Photon Flux is imparting momentum to matter (or else it doesn't matter
anyway!)
Furthermore, if we consider a photon flux from 3-space through 2-space, it is
as you say, a dot appears to expand into a circle, then contract again into a
dot and disappear.When a 4 or 4+ space sends photons through our 3-space, then
these appearing-disappearing circles intersect every possible plane in our
3-space.
I really don't see why this perpendicularity prevents these photons from
exerting real forces in the many ways that have been attributed to the Quantum
Flux. If you accept that there is an electromagnetic Q-Flux then you must
acknowledge the possibility that it exerts radiation pressure on matter. If
this is true, then my various proposals are very plausible.
Incidentally, light in a medium other than space moves slow, yet imparts more
momentum to a mirror that is located inside the medium; therefore, even a
stationary photon may impart momentum to an adjacent surface in the direction
of its propagation, since its action on matter is due to the transverse
movement of the wave.
Researchers have created materials that have negative (not fractional) indices
of refraction, it is thought that light might exert tension on a material
instead of pressure. Again, such light could only do this if its transverse
field motion is what causes it momentum-effects.
Again, I really think I can do this, but I really need help.
Scott
From: froarty...@comcast.net
To: scott...@hotmail.com
CC: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Fran & Group: Please Reconsider the following
pointTime-Frame-Based Casimir Effect
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:20:14 -0400
Scott,
You are knocking on precisely the door I have been trying to open but the
language so easily perverts between time and space when you switch perspectives
between different inertial frames. The task is further obscured by our position
that an apparently “stationary” region inside a cavity can utilize suppression
to generate a different [equivalent?] inertial frame based on changes in the
unit time instead of changing the velocity of an object[a gravity hill]. I
agree with your “pressure” analogy which can trace its origin back to Puthoff’s
atomic model which is then further accumulated / segregated by virtue of
Casimir geometry. Where I disagree however is that these “pressures” could have
a spatial bias without use of a 3rd body to create an asymmetry – My posit is
that the stream of virtual particles exist in a rolled up dimension that is 90
degrees displaced to our spatial plane and where this stream intersects with
the spatial plane the virtual particles appear to grow from nothing outward
into our spatial dimension at a specific xyz coordinate and then just as
quickly shrink back out of our spatial dimensions in a never ending stream.
Therefore the “pressure” is balanced along the time axis and it requires a 3rd
body to interact with these fields in an asymmetrical manner to force the
balance to redistribute between time and space. My bet is that hydrogen atoms
used by Rossi or Mills are exchanging time for energy and would be much older
than hydrogen that was never circulated through a cavity – We know the
difference in light speed thru a Casimir region is only infinitesimally faster
than C as perceived outside the cavity but this is the most rapid example of an
object transitioning the region and piloted directly thru center of the cavity
– think about the accumulating dilation of an object such as a gas atom
residing for hours and slowly migrating into ever decreasing geometry with the
possibility of fractionalized atoms achieving confinements up to 137 times
smaller than a normal atom could achieve.RegardsFran
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:38:41 -0700 Wm. Scott Smith wroteThe Quantum Vacuum
itself exerts radiation pressure all of the time on everything. As measured
within the accelerated time-frame, photon collisions of a given intensity are
happening at exactly the same rate as the corresponding photons that manifest
outside of the cavity, as measured from that external time frame; however, when
we stand outside of the cavity, we see these equally energetic collisions as
happening at a faster rate, inside the cavity and we conclude that more outward
directed momentum is being imparted, inside the cavity than outside the
cavity.The observer inside the cavity would see the same difference in forces,
except he thinks the outside world is passing through time more slowly;
therefore, he concludes that his side of the cavity walls are receiving
momentum at a normal rate, but that the corresponding photons are striking the
external walls more slowly.In other words, both observers agree that there is
more outward directed pressure inside the cavity than there is inward directed
pressure acting on the exterior of the cavity.Again, the pressure is the same
inside and outside the cavity in each of those time frames, but they both see
the same resulting difference in pressure from their own perspective. Really,
the question hinges on whether the inside surface of the wall is in a different
time zone than the outside surface . I think, if our theory is true, that the
surfaces inside the cavity must be inside the faster time zone since it is
this very surface that is causing the time-rate shift. Otherwise, the space
would still be too small for the longer waves!What is causing the Casimir
Effect if what I am saying is not true?Scott
