If the E-Cat is going to truly be analyzed as "black box", we need all inputs and outputs. Obviously, a thermometer "stuck inside" the E-Cat, when we don't know the pressure, physical construction, etc., does nobody any good. (Hell, we don't even know if it's in water, or what type of thermal conductivity is between the thermometer and the core) This is still supposition and silliness. Every time Rossi let's the "E-Cat out of the bag", the demonstrations get worse, and the power gains get smaller. Please let NASA evaluate this device, with no phase change, so we can have real answers in lieu of conjecture.
Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >At 11:45 AM 9/16/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: >>Still I find it baffling why there was no bump in the graph, when >>power was cut off? Do you Alan or anyone else have any ideas? > >There isn't a bump in the graph when it's heating up, >either. Previously we've seen a distinct increase in the slope when >the eCat "ignites". >This eCat is a different beast. > >
