On Sep 25, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Correction: 7kg/h of water consumed.
The calorimetry done in the video confirm results.
It is not clear to me what results are you saying are confirmed?
If 105 gm of steam are produced as stated, then that is 6.3 kg/hr.
If the steam condensed was actually 0.123 kg, as I estimated, then
that is 7.38 kg/hr. The total energy produced is (2.78x10^5 J)/min =
4.63 kW. Perhaps 18 gm of water was lost to vaporization in the one
minute. This would mean a substantial cooling roate for the bucket.
A closed insulated bucket would be best of course.
It certainly is true the steam output looked nothing like that in the
Krivit video; it was much larger.
-----Messaggio originale----- From: Mattia Rizzi
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 2:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Rossi steam calorimetry
Ah, same parameters as in Krivit video.
5kW of power, 7kg/h of steam, same diameter of hose.
-----Messaggio originale----- From: Mattia Rizzi
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
Exaclty.
The video was made ny an italian and show a TRUE 5kW 7kg/h (of
liquid water)
and it's huge, compared to the krivit video, despite some "experts".
-----Messaggio originale----- From: Peter Heckert
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 1:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
Hi
found a video that demonstrates how easy steam calorimetry can be
done:
<http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw>
No heat excanger needed as they will use at sweden and no 6 months of
preparation as Levi claimed.
Some bubbling happens. I think that comes from air, that was dissolved
in the evaporated water and could be avoided with de-gased water.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
