----- Original Nachricht ----
Von: Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]>
An: Peter Heckert <[email protected]>
Datum: 06.10.2011 04:15
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo
> It is not about evidence of cold fusion. There are plenty of evidence
> for anomalous excess heat. Problem is that there is 10^10 times too
> less nuclear radiation and nuclear products present what should be
> associated into such a level excess heat.
I dont see this as a problem. It would be very fine if there is /repeatable/
evidence for anomalous heat.
If there is enough excess heat that cannot be explained conventionally then
this is a definitive proof of nuclear reactions.
So the procedure is this:
1) Make a key-experiment that produces reliably and repeatedly anomalous excess
heat and that can be replicated on any lab-bench.
2) If this is working reliably research it for radiation, particles and element
transmutations.
Einstein said, we must measure that what can be measured (relative speeds and
movements).
If excess energy can be measured and radiation not, then the research must
start with excess energy.
Other research is necessary but can only follow, it is not a starting point if
nothing is measured for unknown reasons.
> See e.g.
> The Status of Cold Fusion (Storms 2010)
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf
>
> or more briefly:
>
> http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion#Experimental_Evidence
>
> ?Jouni
>
>
> 2011/10/5 Peter Heckert <[email protected]>:
> > Am 05.10.2011 20:00, schrieb Jouni Valkonen:
> >>
> >> Very good arguments you presented. Thanks for those. I hope that you are
> >> wrong!
> >>
> > I hope too, that I'm wrong.
> > My hopes however are very low. It is wishful thinking, nothing more.
> >
> > I want a repeatable key experiment to prove LENR effects. If Rossi cannot
> > deliver this, who will do this?
> >
> > This seems to be repeatable:
> >
> <http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960016952_1996035672
> .pdf>
> >
> > Unfortunately it was never finished, because there are still open
> questions.
> > Why?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
