I think that there has not been any serious arguments presented on heat
after death discussion. Frankly it was just silly episode in discussion,
where some who violently are opposing Rossi are just inventing ad hoc
explantions when we are presenting them real data that is in direct
contradiction to their beliefs and prejudices.
But if we are judging tweets correctly E-Cat has now run four hours in "heat
after death" mode.
—Jouni
On Oct 6, 2011 7:39 PM, "Robert Leguillon" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there a long report for July 7th?
>
> I've noticed that the times on the graph do not match Bianchini's report
at all. It appears that the graph may have been clipped during its
"stability phase". If it had leveled for a long period (during phase change)
and then rose again, that would be interesting. What the graph currently
shows contraindicates total water evaporation.
> This would make it a 1.22 kW E-Cat, not a 10.6 kW E-Cat.
> Again, this may just be a bad graph.
>
> Of course, none of this matters after today. The phase change and overflow
water are taken out of the picture, right?
> We can only hope and pray that there is more power observed on the
secondary than is supplied to the primary during peak energy application.
> If gains are only observed during "heat after death", we will be arguing
the results ad infinitum.
>
> Watching Intently,
>
> R.L.
