>No, it isn't. He's talking about energy (Kwh) flow (/h) It's amazing that nobody reads the report. He wrote ENERGY PRODUCED. That's not "energy flow", is energy produced. ANd it's not a "typo", because he wrote it many many times.
2011/10/8 Mauro Lacy <ma...@lacy.com.ar> > On 10/07/2011 10:31 AM, Mattia Rizzi wrote: > >> Stremmeson was a physics/chemistry professor from university of bologna. >> He made several error inside this report. That’s not a typo, is a >> conceptual error, a big one. >> >> > > No, it isn't. He's talking about energy (Kwh) flow (/h). > http://www.wolframalpha.com/**input/?i=kWh/h<http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=kWh/h> > > Although the expression may be confusing, the concepts are clear. > > Regards, > Mauro > >
