Rich Murray wrote:
> Anyway, Horace's painstaking and thorough critique, thoroughly vetted
> and improved in candid discussions on Vortex-L, establishes that the
> demo has not proved excess heat or heat after death.
>
This is surprising. I have spread Horace's (almost) brilliant critique to
all over the Internet as a proof for phenomenal success of the experiment
and that the reality of E-Cat is now beyond any reasonable doubt. It is
funny how differently we interpret the same text...
There was only few errors, misconceptions and criticism that was based on
assumptions, but I considered them as minor flaws. Jed pointed out one and
other is that Horace did not consider that heat exchanger's thermocouples
were calibrated and calibration offset was observed to be one degree. Also
he was mistaken, because he misused the term COP that is only usable concept
for long term power production, but here we only had a short demonstration.
—Jouni
