On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Higgins Bob-CBH003
<bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com> wrote:
> At this point, I can only say that my involvement is personal.  I was
> around in those Patterson days and was part of a panel that considered
> Motorola's involvement.  Unfortunately, I am one of the few from that
> group that is still with the company.  Patterson really didn't want
> Motorola's investment - he wanted a bigger share in what he developed.
> Unfortunately, he passed away soon after the recipe was lost, and I
> don't think it was ever found again by his son.  Patterson Sr. was a
> very senior chemist, but I don't believe his son, who continued CETI was
> (a chemist).
>
> I hope one day I can have Motorola involved in this technology.  It has
> a huge upside potential and I think Motorola could bring a lot to the
> productization.

Thanks for your candid response, Bob.  Seems Rossi suffers from some
of the same impediments as Dr. Patterson.

I had the pleasure of knowing another Bob who was in charge of the Bat
Wings when I began my career in the Communications Division in 1977 as
a Motorola Systems Engineer in Atlanta.

I have been an advocate of Cold Fusion since I read the article in the
Wall Street Journal in 1989 with a brief hiatus that was corrected by
a wonderful man by the name of Chris Tinsley.

I was thrilled when an insider informed me of Motorola's interest in
CF and devastated when it fell apart.

Again, welcome and hang around for what appears to be a great ride!
You won't find a more knowledgeable group anywhere else.

T

Reply via email to