It appeared in the water dump at the end of the September video, that the E-Cat pressure was above 1 ATM. I was merely asking if you were considering that a pressure increase could be driving an increase in boiling temperature. No is a perfectly valid answer, it was just something that I had been entertaining. If the core were releasing enough energy to boil 1 gram/second of water, and condensation or overflow begins accumulating in the hose, the pressure could slowly increase, raising boiling temperature, and decreasing the amount of produced vapor (without an increase in core power required). It was the premise that I'd been using to explain the T2 increase.
David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >The ECAT is not dry during this time, in fact it is filled with water. A >small region of vapor probably exists above the water. > >I do not agree that T2 can change without energy being absorbed by the water. >All indications are that the water is in good contact with the probe. > >Of course the pressure will change with T2. That is expected for a saturated >liquid with vapor above. The entrance to the heat exchanger is maintained at >one atmosphere +/- since any extra pressure would expel the water from the >pipe. No one mentioned anything except smooth flow visible during the test. >I asked Mats Lewan about this issue regarding his measurement of water flow. > >There will be a direct relationship (function) between the pressure and >temperature(T2) within the ECAT and output power delivered to the exchanger >and other loss items. We are seeing incorrect indications at the exchanger >output presently because of thermocouple placement. The real power at the >output is much more reliable. > >There is no superheated steam. > >If you look at the T2 readings as a function of time you do not see any >unusual fast variations that can not be explained. It is well behaved and >changes very slowly as extra heat is added to the water. The pressure changes >are virtually all due to the temperature changes. Actually, there is one >region that I cannot explain. That is where the relatively low temperature at >T2 starts to rise most of the way through the test. > >Dave > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Leguillon <[email protected]> >To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >Sent: Thu, Oct 27, 2011 6:44 pm >Subject: Re: [Vo]:ECAT Measurements Confirm Excess Heat Production > > >You are placing a lot of stock on minor variances of the T2 temperature. >ave you considered that no energy increase is necessary to increase the T2 >robe temperature? It is highly unlikely that the E-Cat is bone dry, and the >team is being superheated. It is much more likely that the fluctuations in >utput temperature are caused by changes in the E-Cat pressure. >ith the same, unchanged input power, a small increase in back pressure (water >illing up the heat exchanger output house, or accumulating at hose bends) >would >ause an increase in T2 temperature, and a decrease in the amount of water >aporized. >ince we have no measure of the amount of water being boiled, this change would >e opaque. >nd, of course, the thermocouple at the output could see spikes from small >hanges in the grams/second of water or water vapor. (this is assuming that its >lacement has rendered the amplitude of its reading meaningless) >
