David, how can you exclude the possibility of hidden chemical resources? 2011/10/27 David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
> The ECAT is not dry during this time, in fact it is filled with water. A > small region of vapor probably exists above the water. > > I do not agree that T2 can change without energy being absorbed by the > water. All indications are that the water is in good contact with the > probe. > > Of course the pressure will change with T2. That is expected for a > saturated liquid with vapor above. The entrance to the heat exchanger is > maintained at one atmosphere +/- since any extra pressure would expel the > water from the pipe. No one mentioned anything except smooth flow visible > during the test. I asked Mats Lewan about this issue regarding his > measurement of water flow. > > There will be a direct relationship (function) between the pressure and > temperature(T2) within the ECAT and output power delivered to the exchanger > and other loss items. We are seeing incorrect indications at the exchanger > output presently because of thermocouple placement. The real power at the > output is much more reliable. > > There is no superheated steam. > > If you look at the T2 readings as a function of time you do not see any > unusual fast variations that can not be explained. It is well behaved and > changes very slowly as extra heat is added to the water. The pressure > changes are virtually all due to the temperature changes. Actually, there > is one region that I cannot explain. That is where the relatively low > temperature at T2 starts to rise most of the way through the test. > > Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Thu, Oct 27, 2011 6:44 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:ECAT Measurements Confirm Excess Heat Production > > You are placing a lot of stock on minor variances of the T2 temperature. > Have you considered that no energy increase is necessary to increase the T2 > probe temperature? It is highly unlikely that the E-Cat is bone dry, and the > steam is being superheated. It is much more likely that the fluctuations in > output temperature are caused by changes in the E-Cat pressure. > With the same, unchanged input power, a small increase in back pressure (water > filling up the heat exchanger output house, or accumulating at hose bends) > would > cause an increase in T2 temperature, and a decrease in the amount of water > vaporized. > Since we have no measure of the amount of water being boiled, this change > would > be opaque. > And, of course, the thermocouple at the output could see spikes from small > changes in the grams/second of water or water vapor. (this is assuming that > its > placement has rendered the amplitude of its reading meaningless) > >
