Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Either that, or the water level fluctuated. That seems more likely to
me. When it starts to rise, you increase the reaction. When it falls
too far, you throttle it.
This is, of course, all old stuff being reiterated here. In the test
from last spring, the electrical power level was (supposedly) fixed;
if it wasn't then the calorimetry was nonsense.
Exactly which test do you refer to? What was the date? There were
several. I think they are listed here:
http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm
I believe Rossi adjusts the power in all of them except the self
sustaining ones, but that does not make the calorimetry nonsense,
because input power is only a small fraction of output power. It makes
the calorimetry inaccurate. Of course the right way to do it would be to
record everything on computer, but that's not Rossi's way, as we know.
- Jed
