>What's your point? I think it's interesting that a *secret* USA customer hired a person that has worked with Rossi. But Jed, you missed again the most interesting part of my message. It's:
Jed Rothwell:> it. If there had been a lot of water coming out with steam, that bucket would have overflowed in no time. Mattia Rizzi: Incorrect since the valve is pratically closed. SImply you don't know. By the way, i've readed many comments by guys that are experts of thermodynamics: nobody will use the "Colonel" approach, but they install a Demister (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demister_%28vapor%29), because with the Colonel approach you can't separe the liquid suspendend insidere the vapour, you collect only the liquid already condensed.Correction: with the Colonel approach you collect *a part *of the water already condensed, since there isn't a U water trap! This measurement is flawed like measurements done up to september. I think it's interesting. Why not install a demister? Btw, they could install a simple and cheaper *water trap*. I think that a simply water trap, with only a condensed water of 1liter/hour wouldn't be a problem. Yep, it's a problem when there are hundred of liquid water mixed with vapour. Mmmh. 2011/11/3 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Mattia Rizzi wrote: > > > So did the colonel, and so did the document they published. >> I mean, Rossi and the colonel have worked toghether in the past. >> > > Yes, I know they have. They talked about it. No one disputes that they > have. What's your point? Do you think that anyone who has worked with Rossi > is automatically disqualified and must be a fraud? > > - Jed > >
