Correction: with the Colonel approach you collect *a part *of the water already condensed, since there isn't a U water trap!
2011/11/3 Mattia Rizzi <[email protected]> > > it. If there had been a lot of water coming out with steam, that bucket > would have overflowed in no time. > > Incorrect since the valve is pratically closed. SImply you don't know. > By the way, i've readed many comments by guys that are experts of > thermodynamics: nobody will use the "Colonel" approach, but they install a > Demister (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demister_%28vapor%29), because > with the Colonel approach you can't separe the liquid suspendend insidere > the vapour, you collect only the liquid already condensed. > This measurement is flawed like measurements done up to september. > I think that the "Colonel" was hired by Ampenergo. By the way, Rossi > confirmed that he has already worked with the Colonel. > > > 2011/11/3 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > >> I wrote: >> >> The colonel and others who know a lot about steam have all said that they >>> are certain this was dry steam. >> >> >> I mean that he said that about Rossi's previous tests. And this one too. >> >> There is no doubt the Oct. 28 test produced only dry steam. You can see >> the condensate collection bucket right below the pipe, with the tube going >> to it. If there had been a lot of water coming out with steam, that bucket >> would have overflowed in no time. >> >> This colonel was confident that of Rossi's previous tests were valid. Ah, >> but if he is secretly in cahoots with Rossi that's *just* what he >> *would*say, isn't it? >> >> I do not believe in conspiracy theories. This one is expanding beyond all >> credibility. You have to believe that Rossi has now paid off George Miley >> and his intrepid grad students as well. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
