Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko! Peter On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Haiko Lietz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all, > > I've published part 10 of my CF column in German online magazine > Telepolis. Of course it's about Rossi again: > > http://www.heise.de/tp/**artikel/35/35803/1.html<http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/35/35803/1.html> > > People quoted: > > - Andrea Rossi > - Jed Rothwell > - Giseppe Levi > - Horace Heffner > - Terry Blanton > > Quotes from Andrea Rossi (Oct 9 2011) not used in the article: > > > What was the purpose of the October 6 experiment? > SEE BELOW > > > Did you use the secondary water circuit to measure output energy to > > avoid the wet steam criticism? > YES > > > Why does output power momentarily rise when input power is cut? > > Do Pout (power out) and the Eout (Energy out) describe the net excess, > > not the total? > THE REASON OF THIS IS CONFIDENTIAL > > > Why was the experiment stopped after 7.5h instead of 12h? Is it because > > the reaction became unstable? > THE TEST TIME HAS BEEN 12 HOURA, DURING WHICH WE HAD TO MAKE ALSO WEIGHT, > COOLING TO ALLOW TO DISASSEMBLE ALL THE PARTS TO PUT IN EVIDENCE ALL THE > INSTRUMENTATION, TO DISASSEMBLE THE INSULATION TO ALLOW TO SEE EVERYTHING > POSSIBLE. THE 12 HOURA WERE FOR ALL OF THIS, AND ALL HAS BEEN MADE AS > SCHEDULED, FROM 9,30 A.M. TO 11,30 P.M. > > > What does the device „producing frequencies“ do? > CONFIDENTIAL > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
