Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
If you understand german read my comment:
<http://www.heise.de/tp/foren/S-Einfache-Erklaerung/forum-214972/msg-21021826/read/changeview-c/>
Peter
Peter
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Haiko Lietz <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear all,
I've published part 10 of my CF column in German online magazine
Telepolis. Of course it's about Rossi again:
http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/35/35803/1.html
People quoted:
- Andrea Rossi
- Jed Rothwell
- Giseppe Levi
- Horace Heffner
- Terry Blanton
Quotes from Andrea Rossi (Oct 9 2011) not used in the article:
> What was the purpose of the October 6 experiment?
SEE BELOW
> Did you use the secondary water circuit to measure output energy to
> avoid the wet steam criticism?
YES
> Why does output power momentarily rise when input power is cut?
> Do Pout (power out) and the Eout (Energy out) describe the net
excess,
> not the total?
THE REASON OF THIS IS CONFIDENTIAL
> Why was the experiment stopped after 7.5h instead of 12h? Is it
because
> the reaction became unstable?
THE TEST TIME HAS BEEN 12 HOURA, DURING WHICH WE HAD TO MAKE ALSO
WEIGHT, COOLING TO ALLOW TO DISASSEMBLE ALL THE PARTS TO PUT IN
EVIDENCE ALL THE INSTRUMENTATION, TO DISASSEMBLE THE INSULATION TO
ALLOW TO SEE EVERYTHING POSSIBLE. THE 12 HOURA WERE FOR ALL OF
THIS, AND ALL HAS BEEN MADE AS SCHEDULED, FROM 9,30 A.M. TO 11,30 P.M.
> What does the device „producing frequencies“ do?
CONFIDENTIAL
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
