Jed, how can you made such measurements without even a water trap?
Why you can't realize that? It's a 2 million trade. The "expert" didn't add
even a simple water trap. It's amazing!
-----Messaggio originale-----
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 2:45 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan on Steam Quality
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
The point 2 is CRITICAL when the measuremnt is done with point 1, because
without using a demister you made a mesuremnt error that *over-extimate*
the real energy produced.
Over-estimate by how much? 470 kW? I doubt it. The exact power level
does not matter. An hour after you turn off input power, the pipe coming
out out would be at room temperature. It would be obvious there is no
heat. You do not need high precision to prove the thing is producing
anomalous heat. The colonel's methods are standard HVAC techniques, and
they are fine.
Anyone can always think of a more precise way, to make a measurement.
The question is: Will the extra precision add to the confidence of the
result? Or will it only add meaningless extra digits of precision while
confusing the issue with extra layers of complexity? The suggestions
made here by skeptics will have the latter effect.
- Jed
