I have to side with Stephen and Terry on this point. Rossi has mad
these statements publically so he bears some responsiblity for the
expectations he generates.  He may not yet be legally accountably, but
he is morally accountable at this time, regardless of his
"personality"
issues.

Harry

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> That is true up to the moment when he makes public commitments as to what
>> he's doing with it.
>>
>> As he has done.
>
> What commitments? Has he signed a contract? Did he give a check to some
> charitable organization, and did this check bounce? I'm not aware of any
> public or private commitments. He has talked about giving money to charity.
> Many people talk about that and never do it. Many people talk about taking a
> Caribbean cruise and never do it.
>
>>
>> You can defend his honesty until you're blue in the face, Jed, but
>> frankly, your explanations for Rossi's statements are not always terribly
>> convincing.
>
> That is an absurd statement. It is totally contrary to the facts. I have
> never defended Rossi's "honesty." On the contrary, I have pointed out again
> and again that he blusters and makes ridiculous statements completely
> contrary to the facts.
> I make no explanations for his statements because the statements are often
> preposterous. I pointed out again and again that he changed his tune about
> his arrangements with Defkalion three times in two weeks. He went from
> agreeing they have the technology, to saying they do not have any cores, and
> then back to saying yes they do have the technology and this is only a
> dispute about financial arrangements.
> What I'm saying here is that Rossi can say whatever he likes about what he
> will do with his own money. He can change his mind five times a day about
> that subject. It is none of your business, or mine, or anyone else's.
> I see no point in speculating about people's private lives.
> - Jed
>

Reply via email to