I wrote: "This is a different statement from the one I made. I
implied Rossi's behavior makes complete sense if he does not believe
in the technology himself. I did not say it makes complete sense
that Rossi does not believe in the technology. There is a
difference. The question though should be which premise is more
consistent with Ross not believing in the technology?"
I guess I need more sleep.
This should read: "This is a different statement from the one I
made. I implied Rossi's behavior makes complete sense if he does not
believe in the technology himself. I did not say it makes complete
sense that Rossi does not believe in the technology. There is a
difference. The question though should be which premise is more
consistent with Rossi's behavior, he believes his own claims, or not?"
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
