Am 25.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Lack of a patent is one side of the vulnerability.
The other, even more important the stealability, guessability of his
solution (catalyst).
I think they intentionally made their scientific publication and their
patent in such a way that it will be rejected.
If he proves that the device or that the catalyst works, he can easily
get a patent.
It could be it doesnt work at all.
Possibly it cannot been patented because it doesnt work or it is stolen.
Possibly he says he has a full house and has nothing.
He is not playing football with his own bones, he is playing poker.
Others make him all proposals and publish announcements and ideas and
theories and research results and he gets them at no cost.
He gets a lot but does not give anything serious.
He accuses all others they want to steal his invention, now then why can
he not been accused to play a irrational and crazy poker play?
Why doesnt he show evidence and patent it by fact, not by theory?
Whatever he does, this is a game and not a serious behaviour.
Its not Football, its Poker what he plays.
Peter
