On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have followed your suggestions for several months now. You have made > the point that Defkalion should show you anything at all. Why do you now > argue about them fulfilling your request? You should be satisfied. > It's interesting that they showed what appears to be a prototype Hyperion apparently with some sort of test set up. It's far from proving that they have a working fusion reactor! I would have expected them to show a large room filled with people making Hyperions. They did not say they had a prototype lab. They said they had a factory. They also said they would soon make a megawatt plant and give the excess heat to the Police Academy **this winter**. It's almost winter. How soon people forget. Defkalion has now shown what looks like a lab prototype. That's a step forward and it means they have done some work. I have no idea what the associated instrumentation and lab bench is. I'd think they'd want to explain it. I'd think they'd give some performance data. And where are their much mentioned regulatory approvals? How about an independent test or customer name? I'm always amazed at how easily satisfied people who believe in an idea without adequate evidence seem to be. This is a tiny step in the right direction but it's not different from Rossi-- it's not even going as far as Rossi. And remember, Rossi said he never gave them any secret sauce. Who did?
