On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:25 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I refer to your posts on the Defkalion site. You repeated a million times > (maybe a few less) that they should show you anything at all. That was > your desire for many posts and now they have done what you requested. Now, > you need to let the world know that they did what you begged them to do and > not keep raising the bar. Is it possible that nothing could satisfy your > desire to trash Rossi and Defkalion? What is the next issue for you to > harp upon? Excuse me for being abrupt, but I do not see how the broken > record repetition is going to improve the world. > You can be as abrupt as you like. But it'd be more interesting if you were also correct and if you showed that you understood the very real issues I raise. I asked many things of Defkalion-- evidence of their government regulatory application, a photo of a factory, people making lots of Hyperions, performance data, evidence of customers, and most of all independent testing to show it works. Perhaps you missed it. Defkalion showed a few blurry images of some lab equipment. That's nice and it demonstrates that they did build up *something* related to Rossi's supposed invention. What it is and what they did is, however, nor much clearer than before. They have provided some images but there is no way to know what those signify. So please stop examining the minutiae of my requests and consider the broad picture. What Defkalion has done is not much better than nothing. Being a broken record is a response to other broken records -- those that keep insisting that the world is now different because of Rossi and Defkalion. I have seen nothing to suggest it and I would be careful not to base any decision whatever on it.
