One point I forgot to mention, even though you might not consider a skeletal cat as capable of granular motion I have noticed many papers refer to a "rigid" Casimir geometry. As such you could have a similar frequency sensitivity of cilia like appendages left when the softer metal is leached away from cavities on either side of the harder alloy. The ability of these rigid cilia to oscillate at certain frequencies has the same effect on hydrogen atoms as granular motion oscillon. I don't think these theories are in conflict but if they can mathematically demonstrate that the oscilion/ nanomagnetism really side steps the 2nd law than it is the certainly the better way to introduce this field to the mainstream in a manner they can accept.
Fran From: francis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 5:22 PM To: '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism Theory Hi Terry, I agree oscillon activity could explain the anomalous heat in the Rossi Reactor, and helps to explain why an external exciter of certain frequencies is necessary but I don't think this is fast enough for pair separation like the recent article using SQUIDS to create the equivalent of boundaries moving near C. I think Mills correctly depicts this as a form of super chemistry although I feel a simpler oscillation between bond states of fractional h1><H2 can be applied avoiding his hydrides or Rossi's copper destructive paths where the Ni overheats and starts to react with hydrogen instead of just being the reactor. The Granular Motion is effectively varying the spacing = suppression values and changing the fractional states of hydrinos or fractional Rydberg gas atoms in between the nano Ni grains. My posit remains that h2 opposes this change creating all kinds of asymmetry, discounting the disassociation level needed to break the bond. For those that say IRH cannot be diatomic I refer to Naudts description of the hydrino as relativistic and would propose these seemingly free protons are more than just associated with nearby electrons in the lattice - I posit the IRH protons are still connected to these nearby electrons by a narrow well that only looks too far displaced from our perspective AND that these seemingly displaced electrons are still in a reshaped orbit around the protons still capable of forming covalent bonds with other hydrogen orbitals. Re: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism Theory Terry Blanton Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:37:33 -0800 Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that it is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as conjectured by others. The powder must remain free and could be located in the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site. Also, if oscillon activity does explain the anomalous heat in the Rossi Reactor, it is easily understood why an external exciter is necessary, eg the "frequencies" described by AR. Now comes the speculation for the heat source. It definitely could be a ZPF heat generator considering that the standing collisions could be limiting the pair formation much like a Casimir cavity or could be allowing rapid pair separation similar to the "mirror" discussed previously. In such case, the energy source could really be positron annihilation, each one liberating 0.511 MeV. I think Ahern, et al have found the secret with this oscillon theory. If so, the new game begins. Here is a simple explanation of oscillons: http://www.raczynski.com/art/oscillon.htm T
