We don't know what kind of ecat they wanted a proof. 2011/11/20 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>
> > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> They are technologically skilled, good engineers and have refused >>> to pay for an immature and unsafe product. >>> >> >> Who are they? Who refused to pay, for what? >> >> I don't see that in the article. >> >> This translation is remarkably good, for a machine. A little hard to >> follow in places. >> >> - Jed >> >> Jed, it seems there was a point in the contract, that the E-cat should > work continuously for at least 48 hours- and it didn't. The heating of > n office with an E-cat for 2 years is fairy tales for adults. > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
