I think it is wrong to ask Rossi for a test.
If the test is successful he is the only one who wins and if it is not
successful, he is the only one who loses.
Because he will not reveal the catalyst, science has no advantage from
it. Others do credible say they have good results without catalyst and
these are more credible persons. This is the route for science.
He does not want to do this, and this is his legit right.
I have no problem with this.
I have problems because this differs abstrusely from that what he
promised some time ago.
Kullander and Essen have said, their stipulation for a test is that they
may publish the results. If not, they will not do a test. They want
science results, not business results.
Because Rossi does not want publication, this test in Uppsala will not
be done this way as Rossi promised it in his forum one or two months
ago. He announced a closed circuit massflow calorimetry test in an
laboratorium in Upsalla in December this year in his forum.
I was ready to believe him.
It was apparently all a very unfair poker bluff.
He ridiculizes anybody, who trusted his promises and who previously
forwarded the good news in good believe. I am ashamed that I ever posted
links to this into a serious physics newsgroup.
I have learned.
I will never again believe anything, if no diamond-clear and -hard facts
are presented.
Anybody who offers him to do a public test, is accused by him to steal
his secret.
This is a reason not to ask him anything anymore. He ridiculizes all his
serious supporters, e.g. Essen and Kullander and Brian Josephson and
Denis Bushnell.
Best regards,
Peter
