I wrote:
> Swartz talked about optimizing output . . . . > I refer to Swartz's papers on Optimal Operating Points (OOP). I do not mean that optimization or a high COP is unimportant. I meant that most researchers considered Swarz's approach premature. They figured that problem will take care of itself after they learn how to control the reaction. And so it did. I think the Hyperion 200 W overhead includes the power needed to control the reaction and also to run the electronics. It takes 200 W to control a 5 - 11 kW small reactor. It takes only 310 W (150 W more) to control a 45 kW reactor. That is an extra 150 W to control an additional 34 kW. That comes to an input to output ratio of ~1:226 for the extra power. I think this ratio is meaningless from an engineering point of view. It probably has some scientific significance. I have no idea how the power controls the reaction. Frankly, I don't care. I am glad there is a method of controlling the reaction. It is worth every joule of overhead. - Jed
