On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Something doesn't make sense. > Many things don't. If the Hyperions require mains power and use only a small battery for backup, what do they do in the event of a long lasting mains power failure in some remote location where it's very cold? Freeze to death, I suppose. Why don't they recycle heat from the output to the input through a regulator if they need heat input? It would be almost trivial compared to what they have gone through to design a safe and consistent commercial grade cold fusion reactor. Doesn't make sense. My theory for what it's worth: - Defkalion made a deal with Rossi back last Spring that he would supply the core technology as a sealed module - They designed Hyperion devices as CAD drawings and built a few prototypes to test - Absent the core modules, they used an electrical heater to simulate the core in the test prototypes - Rossi was unable to deliver modules because he doesn't have any real technology - Defkalion refused to pay him and they had their well known split - Now they are hoping they can either develop their own magic sauce or get it from someone else like Piantelli but they have nothing yet that works. They're trying to buy time by publishing a fanciful set of specs. They're vaporware. How else to explain their prior extravagant claims to having tested many different configurations? How else to explain their promise to build a megawatt plant and heat the Police Academy? How else to explain their failure to show that anything was ever sent to any Greek regulatory agency? How else to explain the newspaper reports that such agencies say they never received anything from Defkalion to test? How else to explain that no Defkalion lab or factory has ever been seen or photographed? How else to explain no known employees except executives? How else to explain nobody has ever claimed in public that they have visited Defkalion and tested Hyperion products or witnessed tests? Jed Rothwell was planning to make or assist with such visits? What went wrong with that effort? What did they use for the photos on their specs sheet? A ten year old cell phone camera? I saw a 6 year old child using a better toy camera than that. Indeed, something doesn't make sense!
