On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Why don't they recycle heat from the output to the input through a >> regulator if they need heat input? >> > > This would appear to be a violation of the laws of thermodynamics. Perhaps > I misunderstand. > No violation, perish the thought! Rossi keeps claiming he needs a safety heater. The entire device is a heater. I suggest to provide the "safety heat" that some portion of the heat from the output be recycled to the input via some sort of regulator or controller. It's not rocket science. I assumed perhaps wrongly that Defkalion makes similar claims. > > My theory for what it's worth: >> > . . . > >> - Absent the core modules, they used an electrical heater to simulate >> the core in the test prototypes >> > > That is imaginative but it is not what they say. > And I've been accused of lacking imagination. I generally don't care what claimants say. I care about what they do and produce and so far, for Defkalion, it's even been less convincing or compelling a show than Rossi's, if that's possible. > > >> Jed Rothwell was planning to make or assist with such visits? What went >> wrong with that effort? >> > > Nothing yet, but it has been delayed, perhaps indefinitely. I do not know > why. > You don't know or you can't say? Why would anyone not want to see the world's most interesting invention? And get a nice live compelling demo? Well, Ockham might have said, "It didn't happen because Defkalion has nothing to show."
