On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It is unprofessional. >> When you put it together with all the other things is telling something >> about Rossi 's conduct. <SNIP>
> If we are going to judge these events based on Rossi's personality and his > quirky behavior we can only conclude that he has nothing. > You were doing fine up to there. > I think it is better to judge the issue based on the laws of physics, and by > similar research by Piantelli and others whose behavior and background is > impeccable. > That's fine too as long as what you mean is to judge the other research on its merits by all means. But other people's research and laws of physics are no evidence for Rossi's claims. And the rest of what you wrote are lame excuses for Rossi based on eccentric behavior by others. The others you named proved their technology by independent tests, something Rossi steadfastly refuses to have done. I am gratified that your suspicions about Defkalion have risen to a suitable level. Unless Rossi provides much better evidence than he already has, your suspicion of him should increase as well. You may want to consider that he used the laws of nature to deceive. It might turn out to be the best explanation for his bizarre statements and even stranger behavior.
