Only the science of instrumentation should be bound by the "laws of physics".
Harry On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It is unprofessional. >>> When you put it together with all the other things is telling something >>> about Rossi 's conduct. <SNIP> > >> If we are going to judge these events based on Rossi's personality and his >> quirky behavior we can only conclude that he has nothing. >> > > You were doing fine up to there. > >> I think it is better to judge the issue based on the laws of physics, and by >> similar research by Piantelli and others whose behavior and background is >> impeccable. >> > > That's fine too as long as what you mean is to judge the other > research on its merits by all means. > > But other people's research and laws of physics are no evidence for > Rossi's claims. And the rest of what you wrote are lame excuses for > Rossi based on eccentric behavior by others. The others you named > proved their technology by independent tests, something Rossi > steadfastly refuses to have done. I am gratified that your suspicions > about Defkalion have risen to a suitable level. Unless Rossi provides > much better evidence than he already has, your suspicion of him should > increase as well. You may want to consider that he used the laws of > nature to deceive. It might turn out to be the best explanation for > his bizarre statements and even stranger behavior. >
