Am 02.12.2011 23:33, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Why didnt you write: "I believe in the Rossi device, because
observers have noticed the surface heated up and because of this
poor insulation it must cool down over 4 hours without power.
Of course this assumes that Rossi did not use tricks with the
input power, but I dont see any possibility how to do this".
Because I have already said that numerous times and everyone knows
that is what I have in mind. When you introduce a new point, such as
the fact that extremely well insulated vessels can be used to cook
food, you should not use this as a way to confuse the issue to imply
that Rossi may have done that.
Everybody knows that I believe there was definitive excess energy
measured in the Essen Kullander demo and in other demos, because the
water flow was too high to been heated to 100°.
Also everybody knows that I suspect Rossi doing tricks with input energy
and with a vacuum at the output hose.
So, because everybody knows that, why should I repeat it over and over?
People would complain, if I would do this.
I am suggesting that you and Yugo be a little more observant of the
rules of academic discourse. This would be to your advantage. Your
arguments would go over better instead of rubbing people the wrong way.
Ok, lets handle this a little bit more relaxed.
Please understand, I am not against CF in general. I dont want to
destroy the idea.
But I dont trust Rossi and Defkalion. I fear they will destroy it, if
the truth becomes apparent.
I would like to hear more about the Patterson cell and the Mizuno
experiments.
I am most interested in experiments without hidden secrets that
definitely work and want to learn about it.
I would be also interested in concrete zeropoint energy experiments that
definitely work.
I have quite good skills and fun with high voltage generation and would
like to do something myself.
So let us repect each others different opinion in peace.
best regards,
Peter
