Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote:

> The other tests cannot be faked as far as I know. No skeptic has come up
> with a plausible method.
>
>
>
> Jed, your memory must be even worse than mine.
>


I mean it. Take your analysis here:

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf

You ignore the central fact about this test which is that the reactor
remained at boiling temperatures for four hours with no input power. It was
too hot to touch. It burned an observer. This is irrefutable proof that the
effect is real. Instead of explaining this, or even trying to deal with
it, you raise nitpicking objections to irrelevant details. I take this as
tacit admission on your part that the effect is real.

Your paper is the best proof that even thoughtful, careful skeptics have no
reasons to doubt this claim. Obviously, people who think that ultrasonic
humidifier mist can be pushed through a long hose never did have any valid
reasons.

- Jed

Reply via email to