Jed, You should read the report you cite again. He doesn't ignore that the reactor remained at boiling temperatures for four hours. He takes it head-on. Go straight to pages 8 and 9.
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:31:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat article by Haiko Leitz From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote: The other tests cannot be faked as far as I know. No skeptic has come up with a plausible method. Jed, your memory must be even worse than mine. I mean it. Take your analysis here: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf You ignore the central fact about this test which is that the reactor remained at boiling temperatures for four hours with no input power. It was too hot to touch. It burned an observer. This is irrefutable proof that the effect is real. Instead of explaining this, or even trying to deal with it, you raise nitpicking objections to irrelevant details. I take this as tacit admission on your part that the effect is real. Your paper is the best proof that even thoughtful, careful skeptics have no reasons to doubt this claim. Obviously, people who think that ultrasonic humidifier mist can be pushed through a long hose never did have any valid reasons. - Jed
