"There is nothing new in MOST of the posts in this string." Very true. as I've been harping on, to everyone, for several weeks now, and it has gotten so bad that even the mild-mannered Horace has issued a plea to move the noise to vortexB. Did you not see his posting? Horace is probably the most patient person on this forum, so when Horace complains, it's gotten pretty bad. This forum is NOT a substitute for the 'comment' section of some website. It is specifically meant to discuss the technical merits of various fringe claims. this has been explained by others besides me.
"And many are repetitive especially Wuller's." This is laughable. Mary, you have 638 posts since 11/10, Mr. Wuller (as either Randy or Ransom) has only 7! That's an exclamation point, not a '1' (one) after the 7; i.e., less than ten. Only the mind of a patho-skeptic could think that the repetition that might occur in 7 posts can even be compared to what has occurred in 638 posts. "Therefore I think you are singling out my posts for your complaints simply because you disagree with my views." Couldn't be further from the truth; when you have brought up something NEW, which has only been a few times out of 638, I have PUBLICLY APPLAUDED it, and thanked you. The OBVIOUS reason why I single your posts out is exactly what I stated, which is BACKED UP BY FACT AND NUMBERS! You waste more bandwidth, BY FAR, than anyone else. Period. There is very LITTLE signal in your postings, which is CONTRARY to the very spirit of this forum, which has also been explained several times. "In any case, I was responding to someone who obviously does not see the pattern and I was trying to make it clear to that party" It's NOT the purpose of this forum to make sure that no one goes away with a particular view. Don't waste ALL other's time by explaining your side to all the newbies. Send them a personal email and spare the rest of us the wasted time. If you feel compelled to REPEAT your position, then respond to new people who just came in on the forum as follows: --------------------- "There is disagreement as to <issue>. Please read the archives to bring yourself up to speed." --------------------- That's it; that's all that is needed. If you're so conceited that you want to make sure they see YOUR views/analysis, then YOU take the time to get the URLs and put them in your reply. Don't make ALL others have to take time to determine if there's anything NEW in your posting. I don't think that's too much to ask. it's a reasonable request, and in compliance with the guidelines set-up by the founder/host of this forum. -Mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Once again, I advise Defkalion to show Stremmenos their reactors On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote: Nothing new in Mary's post. as USUAL. The same old very tired speculations which PROVE nothing. Same waste of bandwidth. Maybe the pattern I pointed out is not news but there is no speculation in my post. It's simply observation and facts. Perhaps you are confusing it with some other. In any case, I was responding to someone who obviously does not see the pattern and I was trying to make it clear to that party. There is nothing new in MOST of the posts in this string. And many are repetitive especially Wuller's. But you don't object to those or any repetition which promotes or favors Rossi and Defkalion. Therefore I think you are singling out my posts for your complaints simply because you disagree with my views. I suggest that if you have some points to make which counter mine that you simply make them.
