Maryyugo's explanation always sounds more rational because he, she conveniently omits the part that Rossi has allowed independent tests (although not performed to his liking) and these tests do show O/I, especially Lewan's 2nd test and the one performed by E & K. If you added the following to the facts, that Rossi has allowed independent tests which are suggestive of O/I of at least 3/1 as well as the reports of others doing similar tests who are reporting O/I of 2/1, then his conclusions appear much less rational and coherent and more like someone conveniently omitting information they don't wish to discuss.
Based on my watching this at least as long as Maryyugo, my best explanation is that while Rossi has a LENR reaction he 1) can't completely control it and 2) when controlling it can't reach the energy level he needs and continues to work on it in hopes of solving the engineering problems he has. Defkalion, knowing it is real don't want to give up on it (given its enormous potential) and having some knowledge of the process are probably getting similar results which are not ready for commercial application. The idea that neither has anything given all the evidence is less likely, although for yugo it is an easy leap since he denies the evidence in the Lewan test by hiding from them and pretending they don't say what they say. But there is no sense arguing with him since all of this is conjecture anyway if you dispute the Rossi demo's and even if you believe them, fraud would still be possible and we are dealing with probabilities and speculation. How come Mary Yugo explanations of the "current events" sounds always the most rational, well thought and coherent? It just fits all the facts. Giovanni On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: Defkalion's responses have a highly Steornish flavor. They are tangential. Evasive. I doubt it's a language problem. The most likely reason Defkalion answers Jed the way they do is that they depended on Rossi's word and his delivery of technology which never happened. My best guess is that it didn't happen for only one reason: Rossi had nothing which would stand up to detailed scrutiny so he created the conflict with Defkalion in order to postpone his exposure as long as possible. That is perhaps also the reason why his *only* client is anonymous. Why else would Rossi break with the one company that could have helped him efficiently and relatively safely market his E-cats and develop the technology? Continuing my theory, for unfathomable reasons, Defkalion may have pressed on without Rossi's core, claiming they developed one of their own. Really? How? And in such a short time? Most likely Defkalion also has nothing. Certainly, they have shown nothing and best as I can determine have never made promised arrangements for government tests or any other tests or visits. All of those were supposed to happen in Q4 2011 or earlier. And the delays, if that's what's going on, have not even been acknowledged or explained by Defkalion. IMO, both Rossi and Defkalion are simply bluffing and delaying, maybe hoping they will be able to develop the technology, whatever that turns out to be. Steorn, Dennis Lee, Carl Tilley and Sniffex, all had no exit plan and neither, it seems, does Mark Goldes. It doesn't seem as if Eestor and BLP do either. With time, either the perpetrators get in trouble with the law or if not, the claims and interest in them just fade out. Perhaps Rossi and Defkalion don't have exit plans either. Maybe both are playing the current game of words by ear.
