Defkalion's responses have a highly Steornish flavor. They are tangential.
Evasive.  I doubt it's a language problem.

The most likely reason Defkalion answers Jed the way they do is that they
depended on Rossi's word and his delivery of technology which never
happened.  My best guess is that it didn't happen for only one reason:
Rossi had nothing which would stand up to detailed scrutiny so he created
the conflict with Defkalion in order to postpone his exposure as long as
possible.  That is perhaps also the reason why his *only* client is
anonymous.  Why else would Rossi break with the one company that could have
helped him efficiently and relatively safely market his E-cats and develop
the technology?

Continuing my theory, for unfathomable reasons, Defkalion may have pressed
on without Rossi's core, claiming they developed one of their own.
Really?  How?  And in such a short time?  Most likely Defkalion also has
nothing.  Certainly, they have shown nothing and best as I can determine
have never made promised arrangements for government tests or any other
tests or visits.  All of those were supposed to happen in Q4 2011 or
earlier.  And the delays, if that's what's going on,  have not even been
acknowledged or explained by Defkalion.

IMO, both Rossi and Defkalion are simply bluffing and delaying, maybe
hoping they will be able to develop the technology, whatever that turns out
to be.   Steorn, Dennis Lee, Carl Tilley and Sniffex, all had no exit plan
and neither, it seems, does Mark Goldes.   It doesn't seem as if Eestor and
BLP do either.  With time, either the perpetrators get in trouble with the
law or if not, the claims and interest in them just fade out.  Perhaps
Rossi and Defkalion don't have exit plans either.  Maybe both are playing
the current game of words by ear.

Reply via email to