>From Mr. Lawrence,

...

> Good.  Nice.  The prototypes (mockups?) apparently look
> pretty, and the paper specs look good.  (So did the
> Batmobile I saw at a car show some years back.  It had
> great specs, too, by the way.)  But do they work? Do
> they do anything at all?  This statement says *nothing*
> about that.

Obviously, Mr. Lawrence is expressing reservations. It seems to me
that expressing doubt under the current circumstances is a perfectly
reasonable conclusion, considering all the obfuscation going on.

As for me, there comes a time when the curious have no choice but to
either trust (or NOT trust) the judgment of another individual. In
this case, the individual I am referring to is Jed Rothwell.

For individuals like MY, or perhaps even Mr. Cude, who are still
relatively new to Vortex... if such individuals have not been around
long enough to acquire a decent assessment of Mr. Rothwell's desire to
not be bamboozled by claims of here-say, dismissing Mr. Rothwell's
current assessment is perfectly understandable.

OTOH, if one has acquired a few years of experience listening to Mr.
Rothwell rant on about this or that issue, all I can say is that I've
learned to trust Jed's judgment on a number of things. I may
occasionally disagree with the fiddledebits, but that does not mean I
don't trust Jed's sincerity to get and disseminate the facts as
clearly as he can.

Therefore, under the circumstances, I guess my impression of DGT has
gone up a few more notches.

I also hope Stremmenos, Rossi, and DGT can eventually work out their
disagreements.

Of course, I'm always free to change my assessment of the principal
actors of this fascinating drama should more facts surface warranting
a change. We should always be free to change our assessment &
opinions. None of us should feel honor-bound by ego or stubbornness to
go down with the sinking ship.

Thanks for the update and your personal assessment, Jed.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to